Both workflows and plug-ins can attach to exactly the same events. Well, plug-ins have available a couple of more events but essentially both work on top of the same event model.Remember also that workflows always run asynchronous and hence, the Asynchronous Processing Service must be running on the server in order to run.
Workflows are more suitable if:
- you want to achieve simple tasks faster, such as sending an e-mail or creating / updating assigning records. These actions can be set up very quickly with a workflow without any need of writing code.
- you want to easily scale things to managers (if they were setup for user records), as it is possible to assign records to them.
- you want to allow an advanced user to make changes to logic. As using the integrated workflow designer is user-friendly, an advanced user would be able to edit an existing workflow and change some rules according to business changes.
- the logic should be available to be run on demand. I mean, when you are within an entity and navigates to “workflows” option in the left pane, all workflows marked as available to run on demand can be executed making them independent of an event trigger.
- you want to send emails making use of templates and attaching files.
Workflows also allow running child workflows which may make a lot of sense in some scenarios. Nevertheless, be careful if you need the child workflow results in order to make decisions on your main workflow, as child workflows always run asynchronous, which means that it will trigger the child workflow and continue. If you need your primary workflow to wait until child ends, you will need to write a custom activity.
On the other hand, plug-ins are more suitable if:
- you need to manipulate data before is saved.
- you need to make validations before submitting the operation.
- you want to be able to cancel an operation based on your validations.
- immediate response to the user is needed.
- you need retrieve values and/or take actions after operation has been completed (i.e. getting and autogenerated id)
It is important to note that since Dynamics CRM 4, plug-ins can also be configured to run asynchronous (Mode attribute while registering plug-in). Nevertheless, pre-event asynchronous plug-ins are not supported. In this case, you will have to set it up as synchronous mode.
Another important thing about plug-ins is the Deployment option which says if the plug-in is going to be executed on the server and/or Outlook client. If both executions are set up and client goes offline and online, plug-in calls are triggered after synchronization so be prepared in this case to execute your code twice!
Regarding to security:
- Workflows triggered automatically will run under the security context of the workflow owner. On the contrary, if executed on demand, the security context of the user who executed the workflow will be used.
- Plug-ins execute under the security context of the CRM Web application pool identity (typically NETWORK SERVICE). As this account typically maps to generic CRM SYSTEM user this typically works fine.
However, within plug-ins you can make use of impersonation to work under the credentials of the user who is making the request. For doing so, you just need to pass True to the CreatCrmService method under the context object.If you need to always impersonate with a specific user, you can do that by passing True as above and setting impersonatinguserid attribute while registering the plug-in.It is important to know that plug-in impersonation does not work offline. The logged on user credentials are always used in this case.
Some other important url for reference are..
Hope it helps..
8 thoughts on “Plug-ins vs. Workflows in Microsoft Dynamics CRM”
Useful post, often face this question when passing over a solution design to CRM Developers.
Find Workflows better for tracking as visible through the CRM UI in a way that Plugins are not, and the ability to ‘place’ your actions through the Workflow Editor is great.
However in experience, Plugins are much easier for error handling (ability to show an error prompt as opposed to an endless Waiting workflow) and deployment (the dreaded ‘I can’t open any draft workflow rule’ error) – and anything User Interface related suits the synchronous approach as opposed to Workflow’s asynchronous approach.
Just my take – but would say that Workflows are better in theory but often Plugins work better in practise. Be interesting to examine how the CRM 2011 Workflow adjustments and Dialogs shakes this up.
Good one Arvind.
Cool site http://business-panorama.com/ – magazine articles, magazine articles, business plan templates and othe.